Paver Smith MD Dougal Paver considers the BNP's recent Question Time appearance, and the party's subsequent 'poll bounce', and asks the question - 'can the wrong publicity be right?'
Let's get one thing clear straight away: the more publicity the BNP get the better.
The moment their arguments and values are held up to even the lightest scrutiny, it becomes clear just how objectionable they are. For all but the most recalcitrant knuckle-dragger there's nothing to commend them and Griffin's shambolic performance - nervous, sweaty, inarticulate and grinning inanely - bore testimony to their awfulness.
Media spotlight on Griffin
So why, then, have they enjoyed a poll bounce since? How could such a poor performance be good for the party? Perhaps there's truth, after all, in the maxim that there's no such thing as bad publicity.
The weekend's papers agonised long and hard over the issue, some blaming the BBC for putting Griffin in the spotlight in the first place. I always thought that one of the great strengths of democracy was its ability to cope with testing viewpoints and deal with them by dint of reasoned argument. Protesting about a fascist by using thuggish tactics, as the protesters outside the Beeb did, seemed somewhat ironic to me.
Anyhow, I think the answer lies somewhere with the two following (and related) observations.
First, Griffin was ganged up on throughout the programme, which made it a rather unedifying spectacle. Those with a twinge of fellowship for the BNP's policies will have felt agrieved at that. There's nowt like a victim culture to rally the fetid masses, now is there?
Straw: ill-conceived tactics?
Second, Labour's core white working class constituency feel they have been taken for granted and that they are the primary losers of the government's relaxed immigration policy. The BNP have only made ground in former Labour heartlands, after all. Ganging up on the one bloke standing up and articulating their sense of injustice - however inconsistent, racist and misguided he may be - was maybe not the cleverest thing to do.
Get him back on Question Time and run the programme along normal lines. If he wishes to run the country, as he does, why are we denied his views on the economy, on education, welfare reform and security, for example?
Let's have 'em, because you can bet your bottom dollar that they are ill-thought-through, inconsistent, intellectually bereft and generally useless. And that, good readers, is the best way of chipping away at the BNP's support.
This opinion piece also appears on the Paver smith blog, which can be found here
The most comprehensive ever review and assessment of the top communicators and marketers working in public services in the North West: the Public Sector 100. READ
The North West’s top marketing folk who collectively control marketing expenditure in excess of £500m and whose endeavours help sustain tens of thousands of jobs. READ
The full listing of How-Do's Media 100. The 2009 list in its entirety, offers the definitive compilation of the most influential and powerful media, creative and digital folk based in the North West. READ
The How-Do poll
Latest comments
George Dearsley: Live and Let Diet
Dumplings Are Forever
You Only Stir Twice
The Man With...
READ
bug buster: next stop UHSM hosts world dance like your dad championships?
READ