Manchester Confidential to introduce paid subscription model

The management team behind the Manchester Confidential portal is looking to fund its further development by charging users a monthly subscription fee for access to the site.The management team behind the Manchester Confidential portal is looking to fund its further development by charging users a monthly subscription fee for access to the site.

Mark Garner, the founder of ManCon, explained the thinking behind the bold move and his belief that publishing mediums, on and offline, could no longer survive by relying solely on advertising revenue.

Although the move to a paid-for model may come as a shock to Manchester Confidential's claimed 260,000 weekly readers (and 94,000 email subscribers) the strategy is apparently something Garner has had in the pipeline for the past five years.

"It was always the plan," he relayed to How-Do.

"The trick, the hard part, was in creating a trusted brand in the first place and, of course, getting the advertising sales right.

"We now believe we're at a stage where the size, loyalty and quality of our readership is such that a significant number will be prepared to pay for the service we provide."

Garner and his team have already conducted numerous focus groups about the proposal and are now at the stage of emailing those 94,000 email recipients to gauge, through an online survey, their reaction to the move and, importantly, how much they might be willing to pay per month.

"Either £4.50 or £7.50 are the figures I have in mind," Garner revealed, before adding that he was prepared to be dictated by the results of the survey on the all-important subs level.

If this figure initially seems high - especially when, as a pioneer of charging for a consumer site, uptake might be understandably slow - it should be remembered, Garner stressed, that the "Manchester Confidential heroes" (loyal readers who take advantage of the portal's various restaurant and retail deals) save on average the not inconsiderable sum of £45 a month.

"That puts it into perspective," he noted, "these are exclusive deals and readers value them."

Of course, not everyone that visits the site is a 'hero', but Garner seems unfazed by the loss of a large chunk of the site's back end bulk.

"I think this will prove the old 80/20 adage. It's the 20% that are useful to the advertisers, to the site and to the brand that are most important. A lot of the rest, for any site, regardless of who you are, is fluff."

Those that may be expecting a gradual evolution into the paid-for format will no doubt be surprised by the alacrity of the switchover - next month has been circled for its arrival.

However, despite the apparent resolve of the team that this IS happening, that advertising alone will NOT sustain publishers ("the business model just does not work," Garner stressed, "as an industry we can not survive purely on advertising revenue"), they are candid enough to admit that they are still "in the process of working this through."

"The subscription model is happening," Garner commented, "but as to how the site will operate, well, the jury's out on that at the moment."

He revealed that the portal has now been rebuilt ready for the change, allowing " a completely walled garden, or a partially walled garden" but that the walls were yet to be drawn out.

"We still want people to take it for a test drive, as it were, but beyond that we're discussing what will happen with regard to subscriber only access or limited access for guests."

It is a bold move and Garner seemed happy to appear as a trailblazer, despite the huge risks to a publisher that has often marketed itself on the sheer scale of its following.

What's more he intends to quickly introduce the model across other names in the Confidential stable - such as Liverpool Confidential - before following with more niche sites such as Kids Confidential and Property Confidential in the near future.

"I've been doing this for a long time," he concluded, "and I honestly think that this has got to the right point to introduce a paid model.

"I've made a lot of mistakes in my time, but I've learned from everyone of them."

The email that is being sent out to current subscribers hints at the editorial changes that lie ahead, noting: "What we’d like to do next is give you more well-known writers and commentators and a comprehensive listing of what’s on across the regions we cover.

"Knitted in with this there will be more and even better deals in restaurants and retail outlets and more Confidential events to keep building on the growing sense of community amongst us."

 

Did you enjoy this article? Please share it!

Something to add? Then leave a comment below or email us now.

I think manchestergossip.com is in its infancy and possibly they now have an opportunity to cast their young nets and capture some of mancons drop offs.

Well, http://www.love-manchester.com looks like it's going to be doing all that and more and it doesn't cost a bean! :)

Well, they're obviously doing really well at hitting that 1,000 subscribers target... considering I keep getting emails about it every other day and it's now December... if people haven't already signed up they're not going to so stop pestering them!

my attidude is typical English and Manchester Confidential is aimed at the good people of England. Hence you may find many readers share my views. But maybe not all

What’s the point of owning brands that can't get paid for their work? I take it, Paula, that you work for a company with a pot of limitless funds. The rest of us recognise that print is collapsing, the world-wide advertising pie has never been able to sustain a free model for any length of time and the consumer has to pay us or we will all be having an early retirement. I for one need to be paid for the articles I write. We need the Mark Garners of this world to be entrepreneurial and have a go. Your attitude is typical English. Over in our New York office everyone is applauding, not sneering at the publishers who are trying to push boundaries. One last thing; I am a regular user of Manchester and Liverpool Confidential and like my food. You can’t get their content anywhere else. Have you seen the two dining deals they did this week? Schofield is hugely entertaining. Mr. Garner, go for it. I for one am prepared to happily pay a cover price.

the way to kill a brand overnight... charge for content you can get for free everywhere else. Maybe Mark Garner fancies an early retirement?!?

that's a real shame mark's gone back on his pledge to publish the results as it would give a good insight into feelings on subscription. But on a different tack, could we refrain from the personal insults when people disagree with opinions here. Its not a teen board but a board for the north west media, and it makes mark look a little undignified. Cheap shots are too easy. who for example thinks mark's a serious player? see. easypeasy cheap shot but contributed what to the debate, exactly? nada. MME said he was a mancon readar, will he now be having been insulted by the publisher for having an opinion? C'mon gents, let's behave a bit more like grown ups.

The results of our questionnaires are in and along with the many conversations I have had with *real* people who have got in touch with me, mostly because of this very useful article, I am pretty sure of the path we are going to take. I have had a rethink about publishing the results and have decided not to do so until after we launch. It’s a fool who can’t change his mind as my Gran used to say. You, ‘Manchester Media Eater’, can de-cloak and email me and if I think you are a serious player I will explain my thoughts and listen to your comments. But, in your previous posts your ‘we in the media’ rather affected tone leads me to believe your people skills to be a little light and that you may well not be a serious player. So, why educate fools? That goes for anyone else by the way, (not the fools bit..) please feel free to email me.

It's Wednesday today Mark. I'm looking forward to hearing your thoughts in detail as promised.

I genuinely am interested - I don't think what you are proposing has a chance of working, but this has provoked a lot of debate and it would be fascinating to see what the survey came up with.

With newspapers going free (The Evening Standard) and websites introducing pay barriers (The Times) - this is an interesting time for all of us who work in online media.

People may scoff at Murdoch's cartel-like approach to paid-for content, but they said exactly the same in 1996 @ Wapping - so let's wait a while before we decide if sites with unique content such as ManCon and the FT can survive an 80/20 split.

But desperate times tend to reward innovators, so this could be a fruitful move for Mark and his team. Roll on 2010...

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
If you have your own website, enter its address here and we will link to it for you.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Please note, you may be asked to fill in a CAPTCHA if our anti-spam system is unsure about your comment.