Burnley Vision has unveiled the dramatic logo that will be at the heart of its £110,000 re-brand exercise, as it looks to improve perceptions of the town and highlight the regeneration work that has transformed its once-maligned appearance.
The pictured logo consists of a sprawl of interwined, multi-coloured bands - illustrating the dynamism of the town and representing different elements of its character.
For example, its is said that the green band signifies the rural areas that surround the main urban cluster, which in itself is represented by the red colour.
As with a great deal of place-branding projects, the new logo appears to be polarising opinion, with council leader Gordon Birtwistle telling the Lancashire Telegraph that it was "bright and unusual and really exciting," while Conservative Coun Jonathan Gilbert described it as "not the best I have seen" and "like some kind of deformed insect."
Exciting or a deformed insect?
At the time of writing the Telegraph's story on the design had received 64 comments from readers, most of which, at first glance, appeared to be damning - the first one that caught How-Do's eye was from 'john the boss' who said: "well the sign sums Burnley council right up...keep going round in circles and end up in a right mess."A spokesperson at the council informed How-Do that the brand was generating a great deal of interest, with our phone call coming immediately after one from Granada Reports.
He was due to get back to us shortly with the name of the agency that created the design - so stay tuned for that, or do let us know if you have your ear to the ground.
The effort to re-invigorate the image of the town is being led by Burnley Vision - an organisation made up of the council, Burnley FC and other local bodies - and has been facilitated by a £300,000 grant it received from the NWDA .
A website with the branding in animated form has now gone live, while it is also due to be rolled out across literature, on marketing material and at gateways to the town.
www.burnley.co.uk
Something to add? Then leave a comment below or email us now . Sponsored links:
1 By Tony Murray , on 12-10-2009 12:18 Well, I must say, hats off to Burnley...Unlike other councils they managed to produce a logo that is both striking and imaginative, whilst encapsulating the dynamism and multi-cultural values of the borough. Only joking. It's sh*t, isn't it?
2 By andrew backhouse , on 12-10-2009 12:34 I may not like it, but at least it is bright and dynamic, unlike the present very dull branding for Burnley which seems straight from the 50s.
3 By Jeff , on 12-10-2009 12:44 "The pictured logo consists of a sprawl of interwined, multi-coloured bands - illustrating the dynamism of the town and representing different elements of its character." Whoever wrote this ought to have had the decency to insert the word "allegedly" before the word "illustrating". I had to check that it was not April 1 when I saw this piece of unadulterated crap. (The logo, I mean, not the How Do report.) It illustrates exquisitely, the bullsh!t world of marketing and advertising. I would have loved to have been at the executive meeting where they nodded sagely as some smoothie explained the concept to them.....
4 By Dave B , on 12-10-2009 12:45 Just shows that you can sell councils any old crap - £110k for this - my 4 year old comes home with this type of stuff from school every night for me at no cost. Says absolutely nothing about Burnely - more suitable to a telecomms company or manufacturer of cabling!!
5 By ab , on 12-10-2009 12:50 well, noone can copy it thats for sure although why Conservative Coun Jonathan Gilbert is commenting on branding i have no idea
6 By Tony Murray , on 12-10-2009 13:16 Would anybody care to name and shame the agency responsible? They have noticably not emerged to take credit, except presumably on their invoice...
7 By Dom Raban , on 12-10-2009 13:36 Oh dear - who's been pulling the wool over the eyes of the poor misguided Burnley councillors? There's no relationship between the crazy bands and the typography, conceptually its on shakier ground than the San Andreas Fault and although it looks sh1t in colour it'll look even more dreadful when the council need to reproduce it in mono!
8 By quango hunter , on 12-10-2009 14:32 Burnley Vision... given money by the NWDA... and so the circle of quango feeding goes on. And this logo does not even reflect Burnley. I've been to Burnley, it's just a bit of a dump like a lot of UK towns. Get a hold of yourselves. One clarification though - I think the logo part of the rebrand only cost £5k, the article seems to imply it is just the logo that cost £110K. What's that I hear? Still a daft rip-off? Oh yes.
9 By Voice of dissent , on 12-10-2009 15:07 Well I actually like it. The website interpretation of it is very nice and it's vibrant, colourful and suggests optimism about growth and the future to me, rather than just the mess you lot see. However, have to agree with Dom's point re reproducing it in mono. But if it's just appearing on signs, the web and a bit of marketing then that shouldn't matter. The typography issue will only be picked up the designers out there, not the general public, who are after all the main target market.
10 By You gotta... , on 12-10-2009 15:09 ....laugh! I was just thinking - all of the foaming at the mouth - mine included - in the various media will be reported back to the client as "return on investment" and "successful raising of brand-awareness" and no doubt form part of the agency's portfolio for future pitches. I'm in the wrong business clearly (freelance assassin).
11 By concerned creative , on 12-10-2009 16:10 It looks like a load of shagbands - and in that game the green band signifies something not a million miles from what Burnley council has just done to the tax-payer...
12 By crazy town, crazy brand , on 12-10-2009 16:03 Tony Murray - your comment really made me chuckle! At least on the website where it's animated it looks slightly better, but really - oh dear. It looks like something Peter Saville might have thrown in the bin when he was was drafting his rather excellent Manchester "M"!
13 By Andrew Fowler , on 12-10-2009 18:17 I knew once the word 'vision' appeared as the second word of the story that the NWDA would have had something to do with this. What an obscene waste of money. They really are signing their own death warrant for when the Tories axe them with this. Burnley is Burnley; a depressed (and depressing) post-industrial northern town. No amount of badge-engineering 're-branding' will change that.
14 By Innocent , on 12-10-2009 18:49 Er, what is a shagband when it is at home?
15 By concerned creative , on 13-10-2009 11:47 shagbands are all the rage amongst our young people - according to the Daily Mail at any rate. http://tinyurl.com/ktryzx do try and keep up
16 By Innocent , on 13-10-2009 14:17 And to think I used to wander round the office with an elastic band on my wrist because I was always needing one for document bundles and such like...
17 By M Bretherton , on 13-10-2009 15:48 Well it's certainly put Burnley on the map - I'm sure I wouldn't have heard of Burnley if they'd come up with some boring coat-of-arms style logo. It's definitely going to divide people but you cannot ignore the fact it's going to get a lot of publicity for Burnley, and that's the aim. Seeing it on the website it grows on you. I'd be interested to read the rationale behind the concept.
18 By Ms. creative , on 13-10-2009 15:49 oooh disturbing logo...need to go back to therapy now!!
19 By Minority , on 13-10-2009 16:26 I think the logo is superb. Creative types are always going on about 'thinking outside the box' and this logo definitely does that. It's also striking and arresting, which is surely what a logo of this type should try to achieve.
20 By Tony Murray , on 13-10-2009 16:43 "...you cannot ignore the fact it's going to get a lot of publicity for Burnley, and that's the aim" Hmm, you'd get a lot of publicity calling your sheltered housing complex: "The Harold Shipman Twilight Home for Needlephobic Gentlefolk." Wouldn't do much for business though.
21 By Minority , on 13-10-2009 17:03 Point taken but then again this logo is hardly the head shot of a shaven headed yob with a swastika on his forehead is it?
22 By Henry , on 13-10-2009 20:06 What can you possibly do with that besides give people headaches and/or seizures? People will only remember Burnley because of it having one of the worst logos I've ever seen. I guess their designer couldn't meet the deadline so he put this "thing" together in 20 minutes.
23 By KRUNA , on 13-10-2009 20:56 Very,, very bad logo. If rule No.1 in logo design is simplicity they missed it big time.
24 By Matt , on 13-10-2009 22:46 Firstly I have never been to Burnley, but as a designer working in the branding and advertising industry, I think this sort of thing creates bad press for both the client and the creative industry in general. I do think the logo is poor, meaningless and generic - I mean, how many logos try and "capture the buzz of the town etc etc". and creates a public perception that the creative industries are a load of crap. The truth is I think this is just a bad logo. You could stick any town name under that logo, use that rationale and try and convince people you have soemthing meaningful. Good design can make a difference - look at the London Tube Map - this logo on the other hand is just impractical nonsense. I would put money on this being approved by a middle management council group with little or no creative background, excited by the fact that their 'trendy" new logo is edgy - and they feel that they're 'pushing the boundaries' by using something unexpected. Design works best when there is careful consultation on both sides, and an honest willingness to consider the product. Does this logo really sum up the experience of living, working or visiting Burnley, or is it a confused mess that doesn't differentiate it from a thousand other English Towns.
25 By DB , on 14-10-2009 10:51 I don't think the logo's going to change John Cooper Clarke's mind. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kLhZTP4ywY
26 By JohS , on 14-10-2009 13:23 Looks like someone dropped a lobster in the Hadron Collider. It may be hip and trendy but would you want to grow old in Burnley based on that?
27 By Andrew Avery , on 14-10-2009 13:55 Nearly as good as the London 2012 logo!
28 By adey11 , on 14-10-2009 14:31 Andrew, I too hated the london 2012 logo initially but think it's grown into its skin and I like it now... not sure about this one though
29 By Andrew Avery , on 14-10-2009 16:42 I wouldn't put that on my fridge... ow wait has a grown up done it?
30 By David Wilkinson , on 14-10-2009 17:39 Whoever sold this into Burnley Council should be congratulated for one of the best 'Emperor's New Clothes' presentations ever!
31 By Tony Murray , on 14-10-2009 18:41 Wilkie, now you're just being modest. On a more serious note, where were you for my comeback drinks in April at the White Lion? Writing your Burnley tender document, I'll be bound.
32 By James Chapman , on 15-10-2009 11:19 After a bit of detective work I managed to obtain one of the planning documents used in putting the site together: http://www.twitpic.com/l8mlp
33 By Onlooker , on 15-10-2009 12:14 Very, very funny Mr Chapman!
34 By AndyC , on 16-10-2009 12:47 Burnley Logo Designer finally revealed to the world... http://bit.ly/3erNf0
35 By Harry enfield , on 17-10-2009 09:34 for those who remember Harry Enfield's Yorkshire Marketing Manager character... "Av only got two things t'say 'bout that design....it's Sh!te!" designer: "and the other?" "SH!TE"
36 By DC , on 20-10-2009 11:11 I'm surprised How Do *still* hasn't worked out who did this rebrand! Come on guys - it only took me a few minutes to find the culprits!
37 By Del Boy , on 20-10-2009 15:06 The people of Burnley should have realised by now that you can't polish a t**d - even when you spend £110,000 on it.
38 By Ellyouefsee , on 20-10-2009 17:00 Who did the rebrand then DC?
39 By DC , on 21-10-2009 08:43 Well if this wasn't a clue: http://tinyurl.com/yk22m9x Then this certainly is: http://www.thinking-place.co.uk/casestudy.asp?pageid=69&caseid=10
40 By Ponderer , on 23-10-2009 17:16 Just checked out www.burnley.co.uk to see the logo in action. Is it me or is there something missing..? Forget the bad logo - how could anyone design (or approve) a publicly-funded website which features the community at work and play AND somehow manage to omit entirely a large proportion of the town's demographic?
41 By Diogenes , on 24-10-2009 12:18 Ponderer, you are right. Who designed this website? Nick Griffin? I couldn\'t spot a black or brown face anywhere. I realise there are racial tensions in Burnley but this looks like digital ethnic cleansing! Amazing!